Aug 30

Move carefully, I can understand. But move at a snail’s pace? Come on.

Fantastic idea. Makes all the sense in the world. But where have you gone, Joe Dimaggio, or in this case, Jerry Yang? Flickr fans around the world–yours truly, included–will welcome word of a Flickr face-lift. Great, but why has it taken forever?

My partner-in-crime Dan Farber was clubbing with assorted Yahoos Saturday night at a celebration of Flickr’s fourth anniversary. That’s where he got word that a Flickr video beta will debut next month. (Here’s more from TechCrunch. )

Big mistake. With the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, I’m sure Yang and the rest of Yahoo management wished they had a do-over. Flickr was always the more valuable franchise. But Yahoo’s made no secret about its intentions to gussy it up with a video makeover. Now it’s apparently about to happen. (If the Microsoft deal goes through, Flickr would be one heck of a brand. Let’s remember that if YouTube has 34 percent of the market, then that leaves 66 percent up for grabs. The challenge is that time’s a wasting and YouTube has a huge lead.) Too bad for Yahoo that their developers failed to pull this off sooner. Kakul Srivastava, director of product management at Flickr, explained to Dan that the company wanted to guarantee that any move into video would be received as “authentic” by the community.

After Yahoo bought Flickr three years ago (this month, actually), management was rightly enamored of its new crown jewel. Flickr was a terrific property. Unfortunately for Yahoo, it blew a big opportunity. When Google bought YouTube in October 2006, the concept of video sharing was about to go viral. I don’t know if that qualifies as one of Clayton Christensen’s “disruptive technologies,” but it comes close. While Yahoo’s own video site was going nowhere fast, Yahoo decided to leave Flickr as a pure photo site.

Jerry Yang

Earlier last week, we broke news of the thaw in merger negotiations between Yahoo and Microsoft. If two sides ultimately decide to tie the knot, get ready for months–maybe years–of furious debate about the wisdom of this deal. But the latest rumblings concerning Flickr speaks volumes about the problems Microsoft may be about to inherit.

Aug 24

Now this is cool. I’ve been thinking lately that a web-based instant messaging (IM) service like Meebo would be all the better if it could be easily integrated into other applications by making itself available as open source. Perhaps my support team could then build it into their support portal, for example?

commentary

Well, the folks at soashable have done just that. They’ve basically built a Meebo clone and licensed it under the GNU General Public License Version 2.

We’ve got DimDim for web conferencing. Ringside Networks for social networking. SoashableIM for web-based IM. All the tools are there to build some killer, open-source based websites.

Aug 21

Adobe is taking Acrobat.com out of beta on Monday, and turning it into a business with paid user accounts. The service, which has more than 5 million registered users will retain its free version, however there are now usage limitations on certain features which can be unlocked by upgrading to one of the two new premium plans. These can be purchased on a monthly or yearly basis and cost $14.99 or $39 a month, or $149 or $390 a year respectively.

The “premium basic” plan allows for 10 PDF conversions per month, as well as up to five meeting participants though Adobe’s ConnectNow tool. The “premium plus” plan dials that up to unlimited PDF conversions, and meetings with up to 20 users. Both premium plans also gain phone and Web support. In comparison, free users will only be able to convert five PDFs, and connect with two people at once in ConnectNow, which is just one less connection than users were able to have during Acrobat’s beta period.

Along with the move to paid accounts, Acrobat.com is getting a new collaborative app called Tables that handles basic spreadsheets. Just like Buzzword, Adobe’s online word processor, this lets multiple users work on a spreadsheet at once, as well as track revisions and roll back to earlier versions.

Tables may not have as many features as some more established online spreadsheet tools, but Adobe is promising to get it there.

(Credit:
CNET)

In a call with CNET News last week, Eric Larson, who is Adobe’s director of product management and marketing for Acrobat.com, told me that Tables is not quite ready to replace Microsoft’s Excel, which is why it’s being rolled out in Adobe’s Acrobat Labs section first. Larson did stress, however, that it will allow users to do things Excel can’t, like see where other people are on the document, and provide a subtle warning when users are making a visual change that will affect others.

Little things that users are used to doing in normal software, like changing column width or sorting order, yields a small warning message that tells them to think twice if there are other people working on it at the same time. It also provides the option to switch to “private view,” which lets users make edits without the changes going live to the main document. Adobe is hoping this type of work flow will cut down on the e-mail overload, and versioning problems that typical office software creates.

I gave the tool a spin over the weekend, and for basic spreadsheet tasks it’s quite nice. Unlike Google Docs, which opens up to a sea of white cells, Tables opens up to just three columns and five rows which can be expanded one at a time. It’s also incredibly responsive, letting you re-organize, and snap around columns and individual cells as if you were using desktop software.

Included are a wide range of formulas, however there is not yet a way to reference individual cells, which may be a show-stopper for some financial applications. You can, however reference entire columns.

Will this be enough to woo users to pay up who were previously getting some of these things for free? Adobe seems to think so, and is still allowing users free and unlimited access to Buzzword, Presentations, and now Tables. The big thing that changes with today’s news is an expansion of the the services that let you share what you’ve created with these free tools, either by converting files, or talking about them in the live meeting solutions.

Adobe is eventually hoping to get Acrobat.com beyond the browser and get its AIR application up to parity, so that users will be able to use these same apps, and access their work off the browser. The company is also trying to get people access to these files and applications on mobile devices, where they’ll be able to make edits and even create new documents, although this isn’t coming until later this year.

Following that, Adobe is working on an upgrade to its PDF technology that will show others when a change has been made by anyone else who is collaborating on it. When it finds that out, it gives them the option to update to the newer version, similar to what happens when a developer makes a change to a software application.

With Acrobat.com, Adobe is coming a little late to a game that Google, Zoho and ThinkFree have been running for years, and that Microsoft is set to join very soon. What may make the difference is that Adobe can work these products very deeply into other pieces of its software. Whether that ends up being a liability compared to competing solutions that remain Web-only is unclear.

Aug 21

VMware took in less money on virtualization software than expected in the fourth quarter, leading to a steep drop in the company’s shares.

The software maker said Monday that it earned $78 million, or 19 cents per share, as compared with $31 million, or 9 cents per share in the prior quarter. Its sales were also up sharply, to $412 million, though that was slightly less than the average analysts’ forecast.

After the report, VMware shares plummeted more than 25 percent in after-hours trading. As of 3 p.m. PST, its shares were trading at $60.60, down $22.40 or more than 26 percent.

In a statement Monday, CEO Diane Greene praised the company’s position, even as it faces a stepped-up attack from Microsoft and other rivals.

“We begin 2008 with more than 100,000 customers, 500 technology and consulting partners, nearly 10,000 go-to-market partners, and more than 5,000 employees,” Greene said. “As others begin to enter the market, VMware and our partners are continuing to broaden and deepen our highly reliable end-to-end virtualization solutions.”

Aug 21

NEW YORK–Being a hot solar start-up apparently requires a lot of money to keep the wind at your sails.

Ausra, which manufactures equipment for solar-thermal power plants, has secured $30 million in venture debt and is negotiating for an “add-on” round of $15 million from original investors Khosla Ventures and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, according to a company executive.

Ausra's pilot solar-thermal power plant in Australia.

(Credit:
Ausra)

Speaking at the Piper Jaffray’s Clean Technology and Renewables Conference here on Wednesday, Ausra executive vice president Glen Davis outlined the company’s capital needs in the coming months.

He added that the company intends to go public by 2010.

Ausra has already signed a deal to build a 177-megawatt solar-power plant and supply electricity for Pacific Gas & Electric in California.

The company is in discussions for another 1,000 megawatts of production and has another 6,000 megawatts “in the pipeline,” Davis said. He said electricity from its system is 30 percent to 40 percent cheaper than solar-photovoltaic plants and equivalent in price to natural-gas power plants with the 30 percent tax credit that renewable-energy projects get.

To finance construction of these plants and company operations, notably the purchase of material and manufacturing of equipment, Ausra is looking to raise series C venture funding of $100 million to $150 million in the third quarter this year. The company will also need two project financings in 2009, he said.

The big projected capital outlays are required for construction of huge solar-thermal power plants, which capture the sun’s heat in the desert to make electricity with a steam turbine.

The PG&E plant, for example, will take up a square mile in the California desert when it goes online in late 2010.

Davis also described Ausra’s planned revenue model. He said the company will initially make its own power plants and sell the electricity to utilities.

But it intends to sell the equipment for its solar-thermal plants, which includes mirrors and “collectors” where water is turned into steam. Within a few years, the company projects making two-thirds of its revenue from equipment sales.

He added that the company is in the process of developing a storage component to its power plants, which it hopes to finish by next year.

The basic idea is to store water at high pressure and turn it into steam, as needed, which will enable plants to dispatch power when there’s no sun or when demand is high.

Aug 21

Over the past few weeks, rumors have swirled about the possibility of Apple’s
iPhone being available on more cell phone carriers’ services. Of course, this has already been announced overseas in a number of countries, including Italy, Australia and India, but so far, there has been no indication that it’ll happen in the US. But if you look at the writing on the wall, it becomes abundantly clear that it will.

iPhone should be set free!

(Credit: Apple)

Although I believe it will happen this year, there’s no doubt that there are a number of hurdles in Apple’s path if it truly wants to open the iPhone up to different carriers. First off, the company will lose its revenue sharing deal with AT&T and ostensibly back out of a five-year exclusivity agreement with the carrier. And while these two issues are important to consider, I have no reason to believe Apple can’t come out on top by backing out of both agreements.

When the deal was signed with AT&T, one important element that’s missing now was true back then — Apple was an unproven entrant into the cell phone market and the company was trying to establish a foothold. Because of that, it entered into an exclusive agreement with AT&T and used that deal to build up considerable demand. But now, the iPhone is a known quantity and Apple carries all the leverage. Beyond that, it’s being faced with a major contender in
Google Android-based phones that will be available on almost every carrier, and thus, must act before it’s too late.

Suffice it to say that Apple will back out of this deal and make the iPhone available on all carriers. Here’s why:

The idea that Apple would shake free from AT&T first came from a report by Fortune that suggested AT&T would start selling a $200 iPhone. And while I still believe that’s ludicrous — I don’t think the iPhone will be any cheaper than $300 — it unleashed a firestorm of rumors that asked if AT&T was dropping the price to confront its impending loss of exclusivity. After all, it seems to make some sense when you take it at face value.

But perhaps more than anything, there are four main factors that help explain why I believe Apple wants out of the exclusivity deal and will get it done: Competition, the enterprise, its strategy overseas is suggesting such a move, and finances.

Competition

When Apple first started in the highly-competitive cell phone business, it didn’t know what to expect. Would it be just another wannabe or a major player in the industry? Because of that, it did something unique — formed an exclusivity deal with AT&T — and established itself in the market. But now, the game has changed.

Unlike its competitors, you can’t find an iPhone on other carriers (unless it’s jailbroken) and Apple and AT&T have strictly prohibited iPhone use on T-Mobile or any other GSM carrier. But if you look at Apple’s main competition — RIM, Palm, LG and others — you can use most of those phones on almost any carrier you prefer. Because of that, Apple’s competitors are capable of expanding their base much quicker and have the opportunity to stifle the iPhone’s growth in the smartphone market.

If Apple truly wants to avoid competitive upheaval, it needs to eliminate one of its most vulnerable points — availability. Although it was able to coax many to AT&T’s side last year, it wasn’t able to coax enough people to justify it maintaing an exclusivity deal with the carrier. After all, if a customer truly dislikes AT&T’s offerings and prefers T-Mobile, is the iPhone enough to bring them over? If not, all of those issues would be resolved with a moratorium on all exclusivity deals.

The enterprise

Nowhere is the focus on competition so paramount than in the enterprise space. And nowhere is the issue of exclusivity as important as it is in the enterprise space. So far, Apple’s ability to break into the enterprise and push RIM out has been laughable. And although it has announced a slew of improvements to the iPhone to make it more appealing to the enterprise and help it better compete with RIM, exclusivity is still a major issue with many companies. And you’re kidding yourself if you believe Apple doesn’t care.

In most major companies, the executives sign a deal with carriers that allow them to get a special business relationship, but also require the use of certain devices depending on an employee’s position in the company. More often than not, major companies will allow the use of a few cell phone carriers, but smaller enterprises usually only have a deal with one. What if AT&T isn’t one of the supported carriers? Regardless of the iPhone’s new features, if people can’t have it on the carrier they’re required to use by their employer, what good is it?

RIM was one of the first companies to realize that exclusivity isn’t the best tack and has done its part to put its BlackBerry on a slew of major carriers. Because of that, it was able to enjoy success in the enterprise through a dual-pronged approach — give businesses what they want and make sure it’s available to them. Apple may soon achieve one of these goals, but it’s failing at achieving the other. And RIM couldn’t be any happier.

Its strategy overseas

In just the past few weeks, Apple has entered into agreements overseas that will allow it move away from exclusivity and allow consumers to enjoy the iPhone on almost any carrier. So far, the iPhone will be made available on a host of different carriers in India, Italy, Australia, and seven other countries that Vodafone is currently operating in.

Some have said that Apple’s decision to abandon exclusivity overseas reflects its desire to break into new markets, but let’s not forget that those deals have yielded lackluster results and the company is still stunting its growth in the US by being exclusive.

Simply put, there’s no reason to suggest that just because Apple isn’t announcing the end to its exclusivity deal in the US, it won’t happen here. And if it’s following that strategy overseas and obviously realizing that it’s not the best way to be competitive in this industry, who can possibly say that it won’t follow such a path before the five-year agreement is up?

Economics

Invariably, the discussion on whether or not Apple should make the iPhone open to all carriers will come back to economics. What will the net effect on the company’s bottom line be if it abandons its revenue sharing deal and tries selling the iPhone for use on any carrier instead?

If Piper Jaffray’s report is true, Apple is making about $18 per iPhone, per month. Of course, this number is just an estimate and there’s no guarantee that it stays constant over the life of a two-year contract. If it does, some have suggested that Apple may be making a profit of over $500 per iPhone after sales and revenue sharing are taken into account over the two-year period. Assuming Apple eventually hits its 10 million iPhones sold mark, the company could stand to gain approximately $5 billion from their sale. Of course, that number doesn’t take into account a number of factors (including research and development costs), so it’s probably safe to assume that it’s not making nearly that much.

Regardless, Apple can stand to make much more if it gets out of its exclusivity agreement. Why? Its untapped market figures will leap and suddenly it can sell its device (which some cost at no more than half its price) to millions more. In other words, it should be able to easily make up for its profit loss on the exclusivity deal and make much more through the sale of the iPhone to businesses and consumers who want to put it on other carriers.

That said, a full review of figures are practically impossible considering Apple never explained how much it actually makes off the sale of one iPhone over two years. But if it’s willing to abandon exclusivity deals overseas, wouldn’t it make sense to say that it stands to make much more without revenue sharing?

Whether or not Apple will allow the iPhone to be available on other services relies on its ability to get out of the exclusive agreement it formed with AT&T. And although it may not be an easy move, I think Apple either has already done it or is well on its way to getting out already. Of course, it probably came at quite a cost. In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me if the company needs to maintain a similar relationship with AT&T where the iPhone will be available for sale at the carrier’s stores.

Apple has all the leverage right now and there’s no reason to suggest that it can’t use it to its advantage.

Making the iPhone available to all carriers in the US this year makes sense on a variety of levels. Now we just need to wait for it to happen. And I think it will.

Aug 21

(Credit:
Woot)

One-day one-deal site Woot has refurbished TiVo HD units on sale for $179.99 plus an impossibly fair 5 bucks for shipping. What’s more, you can get the first three months of service free by entering coupon code 3FREEHD when you activate the TiVo.

After that, it’ll cost you $16.95 $12.95 per month, which is the one and only reason the Cheapskate has never taken the TiVo plunge. No, I’m more of a Windows Media Center man, what with the free program guide and all. But I’ve poked, prodded, and tested the TiVo HD, and let’s be clear: It’s the greatest thing since, well, HDTV. Two HD tuners, 30-second commercial skip, support for cable and over-the-air signals… it’s DVR nirvana.

Before you buy, however, make sure to read CNET’s in-depth TiVo HD review, which lists some important caveats. And remember that this deal comes from Woot, meaning it could sell out at any moment. If you want to bring the goodness that is TiVo HD into your life, act fast!

Find more deals, coupon codes, and bargains on CNET’s Shopper.com.

Aug 21

Intel filled in some of the missing details on its Silverthorne mobile processor Tuesday, helping explain how it managed to get the power consumption of this chip down under a couple of watts.

Gianfranco Gerosa of Intel presented the company’s paper on Silverthorne, its low-power mobile processor destined for the next generation of mobile Internet devices later this quarter, during the International Solid State Circuits Conference in San Francisco. Intel Chief Technology Officer Justin Rattner had already discussed Silverthorne in some detail last week, but the wonky details were laid bare for a roomful of people who are way, way smarter than me.

A few Silverthorne tidbits, however, could be deciphered by those of us who wasted their education dollars on a business degree. This chip is tiny, measuring just 3.1 millimeters by 7.8 millimeters for a die size of 24.2 millimeters squared. By comparison, the dual-core version of Intel’s newest Penryn chips for PCs has a die size of 107 millimeters squared. That means Intel can make roughly four times as many Silverthorne chips on a single silicon wafer as compared with the dual-core Penryns. Let’s see how much the company decides to charge for it.

The chip will be able to reach 2.5GHz, although Intel is quoting a 2GHz clock speed for the 2-watt thermal design power, or the maximum power consumption that system designers have to take into account when building their devices. It uses a 16-stage pipeline, compared to the 14-stage pipeline used by the Core 2 Duo chips.

Think of a pipeline stage as part of an assembly line: the more stages in the process, the faster it has to run to build something in the same amount of time as a line with fewer steps. Intel’s Pentium 4 processor topped out at 31 stages, which allowed the company to crank it up over 3GHz to satisfy the marketing department’s proclamation that the only thing us mortal PC buyers understood was clock speed.

Unfortunately for Intel, that wasn’t a very sound design. A chip running at that kind of speed runs way too hot, especially as current leakage problems became more pronounced, so Intel designed the Pentium M microprocessor with fewer pipeline stages. It did more work per stage, which allowed it to run slower and cooler. Eventually, those design principles were incorporated into the Core lineup of processors, and Intel got its mojo back.

So it’s a bit surprising that its most serious low-power effort to date would have two additional pipeline stages, but Intel got around that problem by switching to an in-order pipeline, and by adding hyperthreading. That combination produced the most efficient performance-per-watt ratings in Intel’s internal testing, Gerosa said.

Silverthorne also makes use of several low-power states in which the chip shuts down certain elements of the processor when they aren’t required by the software. Intel estimates that Silverthorne will spend 90 percent of its time in deepest sleep state, which it calls C6. Virtually everything gets turned off in C6, and it takes 100 microseconds to wake the chip back up when new processing orders come in, Gerosa said.

As a result, Intel is quoting average power numbers for Silverthorne “in the order of a few hundred (milliwatts),” which sounds like quite the accomplishment. That will be nice for battery life, but it doesn’t really matter when it comes to building a sleek device. Anyone who wants to use Silverthorne will have to design a device that can handle the full 2 watts of power that Silverthorne will consume running flat out.

After all, the whole point of Intel’s pitch to put x86 chips in mobile devices is that those devices would be able to run Windows and any piece of PC software. While Intel is increasingly pitching Linux for its mobile devices–and keeping a close eye on that other mobile operating system–there are certain tasks that are going to require all the processing power Silverthorne can deliver.

The MIDs that Intel and its partners have shown off using Silverthorne don’t look all that different from the older MIDs that haven’t sold very well to date. They’re still a little too bulky to compete with slicker smart phones from the likes of Nokia, Samsung, and Apple, which are powered by chips designed by ARM for mobile phones.

True competition from Intel in this area probably won’t arrive until the Moorestown chip is ready in a couple of years, but Silverthorne is a milestone on that path. We’ll start to see if people are interested in MIDs based on the chip by the middle of this year, when we’ll also get a true sense of its performance.

Aug 21

Canonical on Tuesday released its first publicly available developer edition of Ubuntu for mobile Internet devices.

One option for Ubuntu MID's user interface.

(Credit:
Canonical)

Ubuntu MID works on two devices at present, the Samsung Q1U and the Intel Crown Beach development station for building devices using the company’s Atom processor. It also can be run on ordinary computers through the KVM virtualization software. A MID–a concept Intel is aggressively promoting–is a mobile device larger and more like a regular computer than, say an
Apple iPhone, but smaller than an ultraportable PC.

“This release marks the start of a way for new users to experience Ubuntu and Open Source software and as the hardware becomes commonplace it will become a very exciting place to get users experiencing applications from our communities,” said David Mandala, project manager of the Ubuntu Mobile and Embedded Group, in a blog posting.

Canonical will release new versions of the software on the same six-month cycle as it uses for the desktop version of the open-source operating system, the company said.

“Ubuntu MID Edition, a fully open-source project, gives the full Internet, with no compromise,” boasts the project description said. “All unnecessary complexity in the user experience is eliminated.”

Ubuntu MID can be used with a touch screen and has a specially designed Web browser.

Aug 21

Nokia N86

(Credit:
Nokia)

Samsung typically dominates the FCC certification list on a given week, but this week Nokia made a decent showing. Two Nokia models passed through the agency’s gates, including the Nokia N86 with an 8-megapixel camera. Because the Federal Communications Commission has to certify every phone sold in the United States, not to mention test its SAR rating, the agency’s online database offers a lot of sneak peeks to those who dig. And to save you the trouble, Crave has combed through the database for you. Here is a selection of filings from the past week on new and upcoming cell phones. Click through to read the full report.

HTC

Huawei G3500

Huawei U9105

LG AX310

LG T365

Motorola

Nokia 6600i Slide

Nokia N86 (with 8-megapixel camera)

Samsung GT-S6700C

Samsung SCH-i920

Samsung SCH-W290

Samsung SGH-A887

Toshiba Iida

ZTE S131-T

« Previous Entries